Theranos’ Holmes says investors were future-focused as testimony wraps

Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes leaves after a hearing at a federal court in San Jose, California, July 17, U.S., 2019. REUTERS/Stephen Lam

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

SAN JOSE, Calif., Dec 8 (Reuters) – Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes finished testifying in her own defense against fraud charges on Wednesday morning, telling jurors that investors “weren’t interested in today” but focused on the blood-testing startup’s impact in the long-run.

Holmes, 37, faces nine counts of fraud and two counts of conspiracy for allegedly lying about Theranos’ technology to bring in cash from wealthy private investors and patients who paid for tests from the company.

Holmes rose to fame in Silicon Valley for her ambitious play to reinvent blood testing with a device that supposedly could perform a diagnostic analysis from a finger prick.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Once valued at $9 billion, Theranos collapsed after the Wall Street Journal published a series of articles, starting in 2015, that suggested its devices were flawed and inaccurate.

Prosecutors allege Holmes’ fraud included false claims that Theranos’ devices were able to run a range of tests more quickly and accurately than conventional laboratory means.

During her final moments on the stand, Holmes said that she had sought to communicate the future promise of the company to long-term investors.

“I wanted to convey the impact the company could make for people and for healthcare,” Holmes said. “They weren’t interested in today, tomorrow or next month.”

Neither Holmes’ attorneys nor prosecutors called further witnesses on Wednesday. Jurors will hear closing arguments on an unspecified date.

U.S. District Judge Edward Davila said that he needs time to hear arguments from the parties about the legal instructions he will give jurors, and that deliberations in the case could begin as late as January, depending on jurors’ holiday plans.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Reporting by Jody Godoy in San Jose; Editing by Amy Stevens and Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Jody Godoy

Jody Godoy reports on banking and securities law. Reach her at

Read More

Leigha Geddes